Digital Technology Agenda for Business in 2016


Technology innovation is accelerating faster than companies can keep up with. Many feel pressure to adopt new strategies that technology makes possible and find the resources required for necessary investments. In 2015 our research and analysis revealed many organizations upgrading key business applications to operate in the cloud and some enabling access to information for employees through mobile devices. Despite these steps, we find significant levels of digital disruption impacting every line of business. In our series of research agendas for 2016 we outline the areas of technology that organizations need to understand if they hope to optimize their business processes and empower their employees to handle tasks and make decisions effectively. Every industry, line of business and IT department will need to be aware of how new technology can provide opportunities to get ahead of, or at least keep up with, their competitors and focus on achieving the most effective outcomes.

Let’s review the digital disruptions that are impacting businesses of every size in any industry.

Analytics is at the top of the list. It has become indispensable not just for measuring performance and efficiency but also for guiding effective actions that make critical differences in an organization. Once just an ad hoc part of business intelligence efforts, analytics now can have a continuous role in Untitledstreamlining business processes. Historical analysis – measuring the past to inform the present – is no longer sufficient; looking forward with predictive analytics can help organizations anticipate future behavior and outcomes. Our benchmark research on predictive analytics shows that nearly half (49%) of organizations expect to gain significant impact from utilizing it, and another one-third (32%) said it can have transformational impact.

However, to develop continuous analytics organizations first must prepare for use the data to be analyzed. Typically this requires significant amounts of time from analysts, data and vr_DAC_20_justification_for_data_preparationoperations professionals – time that could be used more productively. Today they can regain that time by using data preparation tools designed for this purpose. In 2016 we will perform in-depth market research on data preparation to assess the variety of ways in which it is used and where it can offer the greatest benefit to analytics and operations. Our research in 2015 found that preparing data for analysis is the most common impediment in the analytics process for more than half (55%) of organizations, as it has been for the past five years. We also will conduct and publish new research on the role of analytics in the sales, finance and human resources functions. In these and other lines of business we assert that organizations must develop competencies in analytics and begin using them continuously to improve their performance and competitiveness. Look at your own organization to determine if you have made analytics a priority and is being used effectively.

Another precursor to continuous analytics is collecting and processing what is commonly called big data, the huge volumes and broad variety of data that organizations encounter. Advances in computing technology including in-memory processing and storage of big data are now cost-effective and can be readily accessed and used through cloud computing. Because not all data is the same, ranging from structured data to unstructured content, documents and text, how businesses vr_DAC_07_importance_of_external_data_sourcesmanage their information assets is just as important as the guidance they receive from analyzing them. To further investigate the impact of big data on business, we will perform new benchmark research to determine where investment can have the greatest impact in terms of value and time savings. Managing data effectively enables organizations to optimize their information, and there are other sources of data that can add to what they know. My colleague Robert Kugel has named this “cryptic data”; typically it is out of reach of business users, tucked away on the Internet and in external sources, but accessing it could enrich the value of existing information and analytics. Last year our data and analytics in the cloud benchmark research found that Internet information sources are important to 42 percent of organizations.

It is important to remember that big data is not just about data management but also about how it is interconnected and used for business purposes. Industry jargon that isolates it in “data lakes” and other ridiculous terms do a disservice to its full potential for analytics and any range of applications, extending even to advances in the Internet of Things (IoT), which connects whole networks and myriad devices to each other.   Beyond this data science has intersected with expert systems to produce cognitive computing systems that can learn from past and present decisions and interactions to answer questions in natural language and guide decisions to optimal results.

In the excitement over big data and analytics it’s easy to forget that they are useful only when people work with them, and businesses rely on their people to interact and collaborate to reach agreement or better understand opportunities and situations to be resolved. Through a new generation of digital technologies, workers and managers alike can engage in discussions interactively online, through videoconferences that can share applications and presentations and with mobile technologies that make it simpler to collaborate at any time from any place. Our next-generation learning management benchmark research found that social collaboration is critical for more than half of organizations to share learning socially through activity streams. Technology enables even digital “town hall” meetings in which workers anywhere on the planet join in interactive scdiscussions. But collaborative technologies must be used in context of business processes that rely on business applications in which information must be shared, assessed and acted upon to achieve specific goals. Thus the idea of embedding collaboration in business application is taking hold among large application providers, although some just make it available separately. Our research in the past several years has identified collaboration as one of the most widely recognized digital technologies to advance business processes; for example, more than one-third (38%) of participants in our data and analytics in the cloud research are using it, although fewer than that (30%) are satisfied with how they collaborate, which is not surprising when many are still using email as the primary mode of collaboration. The good news is that new methods are gaining traction: Almost half (47%) are planning to use or are evaluating discussion forums, and nearly as many (48%) are interested in wall posting. New research we’ll produce in 2016 will identify the further adoption of collaboration and best practices in contact centers, sales, human resources and finance groups. Furthermore, to better engage workers in the organization, a new generation of digital feedback techniques used in consumer applications for easy-to-rate feedback is migrating into business. In general collaboration using digital techniques is still one of the most underutilized methods in organizations, but it can have large returns on investment since it engages and should motivate workforces to interact with others and management.

Another major new digital technology that has reshaped the way organizations use information is cloud computing, which enables applications or services to operate beyond an enterprise’s own premises. It can help organizations simplify access to and use of software by removing barriers of resources and vr_DAC_04_widespread_use_of_cloud_based_analyticsskills, allowing any size of organization to exceed its previous computing capabilities. Simplifying the ability to onboard a range of software whether business applications or other tools and to manage them easily in any area of business in conjunction with IT policies provides a radically faster time to value. We have also seen this in the use of analytics, as almost half of organizations in our data and analytics in the cloud research already use cloud-based analytics in some manner and another one-fifth (19%) will use it in the next year. Now organizations are shifting to integrating business applications in the cloud and in the enterprise, a process that requires integration software designed to help streamline interoperability. Underlying this transition of business computing is a movement toward the platform as a service (PaaS) and messaging that interconnects business and consumers in a range of cloud environments – public, private and hybrid. The enterprise architecture of the future is centered in the cloud; much of the software industry has shifted to this approach, and business organizations will be required to adapt or be left using and managing their own software. It is only a matter of time until they will not have a choice as new applications are rapidly becoming available only in the cloud.

Until recently many businesses have worried about the security of systems they don’t deploy and control themselves. Our data and analytics in the cloud benchmark research vr_DAC_13_impediments_to_deploying_cloud_based_analyticsshows that lack of confidence in security is still the most frequent impediment to deployment cloud-based analytics, in more than half (56%) of organizations. Arising from these worries is new digital technology designed to ensure cybersecurity and protect intellectual assets (systems, internal data and customer information) from being hacked and compromised. More than a few large-scale incidents have shown that such attacks can significantly impact not only financial profitability but an organization’s credibility. Alert organizations now realize that just protecting the network that connects their computers and systems is insufficient to ensure that the full range of threats is mitigated. For example, most organizations have not effectively inventoried and assessed their IT assets to identify outdated software that might have known cyber exposures that can create wormholes that work from inside the organization to the outside. Building on IT asset management is the ability to identify legacy systems that increase threats and put data at risk in databases or from systems and tools that access them from more than one location. Such vigilance requires a sophisticated set of technology that not only detects and responds to threats but can recommend and even act on cyber exposures before situations reach crisis levels. The data within databases and analytics also needs to be secured. This challenge will require a new generation of cyberintelligence that is managed directly by the CIO’s office and understood by business management.

As if all this was not complicated enough, now we have the Internet of Things (IoT) emerging. Devices, machines and networks that are interconnected to the Internet through sensors and messaging are no longer just for monitoring but also for interactive dialogues that notify and take action on threats or malfunctions. As we evolve to this technologically sophisticated world, even things we wear, from watches to certain types of clothing, also can provide information on business and personal activities that range from responding to requests to the wellness of individuals. The underlying connectivity comes from the use of Bluetooth and RFID for cellular or WiFi connections directly onto the Internet. As we find ways to miniaturize and embed sensors and related technology that can provide data, we also find that the processing is operating at the edge of the network and within machines, even automobiles. These Internet-level bots do not just operate at the edge of the network but can also transport themselves to where processing needs to happen. IoT will require applications that can monitor systems and also be used to manage monetization as in subscription to services and interact across any range of services. Such a change will require advanced skills in IoT analytics and capabilities for real-time processing; we call this the next generation of operational intelligence and are conducting new market research to determine the rate of innovation and emerging best practices in adoption of the technologies.

As we all can see, smartphones and tablets are vr_DAC_17_mobile_access_to_cloud_based_analyticseverywhere, connecting people and the Internet. The potential for businesses is enormous, and it will be a necessity for them to equip and support their workers and managers with applications that can easily operate on these devices. Unfortunately so far many business software applications and tools provide only lip service to using their capabilities; few of these vendors have a “mobile first” approach to supporting workforce effectiveness. Working across devices from Apple or Android has plenty of nuances, and many applications require a lot of “pinching” to interact with them rather dynamically sizing in response to the device on which it operates. Additionally, a new generation of notebooks that operate through touch screens and tablets that use Microsoft Windows is emerging. Giving ineffective software to mobile-enabled workers can lead to employee dissatisfaction and become a factor in why they leave an organization. Ensuring that mobile apps provide a contemporary user experience and easy usability is more important than just the app’s capabilities; don’t listen to analyst firms that rate them on the number of customers or amount of revenue they have generated. Such recommendations have led many organizations to select the wrong software and weaken themselves for years to come. With new research in 2016 we will continue our decade-long analysis of the mobile revolution and its impact on business; we advise that embracing mobile-ready applications is essential to maximize the value of the workforce.

Mobile technology advances have paved the way for a new generation of wearable devices, most evidently the new kind of watch, which is now ready for businesses to use to consume and act on information and make decisions. Wearables can support business productivity by increasing the responsiveness of individuals in any role. A new generation of smart watches that are easier for technology providers to integrate with business applications is available and will begin to establish new workflow and interactivity capabilities. Our upcoming research into the new generation of human resources management systems (HRMSs) and into workforce management will assess the demand for these applications. This generation of wearables will come with location information that can be used to promote situational awareness and be optimized for a variety of uses. For many organizations and workers, using wearables provides immediate visibility on the wellness of individuals that not just helps the individual maintain personal health but helps organizations ensure that workers are able to conduct their job responsibilities in ways that minimize risk and ensure safety.

As you see, this will be a big year for technology and potentially just as big a one for business in learning to take advantage of these advances. We have put together a formalized set of research agendas covering all of these areas for more depth on our direction in 2016. Please rely on Ventana Research to help guide you in understanding the challenges and making the decisions that will serve your organization best.

Regards,

Mark Smith

CEO and Chief Research Officer

Skills Gap Challenges Potential of Predictive Analytics


The Performance Index analysis we performed as part of our next-generation predictive analytics benchmark research shows that only one in four organizations, those functioning at the highest Innovative level of performance, can use predictive analytics to compete effectively against others that use this technology less well. We analyze performance in detail in four dimensions (People, Process, Information and Technology), and for predictive analytics we find that organizations perform best in the Technology dimension, with 38 percent reaching the top Innovative level. This is often the case in our analyses, as organizations initially perform better in the details of selectingvr_NG_Predictive_Analytics_performance_06_dimensions and managing new tools than in the other dimensions. Predictive analytics is not a new technology per se, but the difference is that it is becoming more common in business units, as I have written.

In contrast to organizations’ performance in the Technology dimension, only 10 percent reach the Innovative level in People and only 11 percent in Process. This disparity uncovered by the research analysis suggests there is value in focusing on the skills that are used to design and deploy predictive analytics. In particular, we found that one of the two most-often cited reasons why participants are not fully satisfied with the organization’s use of predictive analytics is that there are not enough skilled resources (cited by 62%). In addition, 29 percent said that the need for too much training or customized skills is a barrier to changing their predictive analytics.

The challenge for many organizations is to find the combination of domain knowledge, statistical and mathematical knowledge, and technical knowledge that it needs to be able to integrate predictive analytics into other technology systems and into operations in the lines of business, which I also have discussed. The need for technical knowledge is evident in the research findings on the jobs held by individual participants: Three out of four require technical sophistication. More than one-third (35%) are data scientists who have a deep understanding of predictive analytics and its use as well as of data-related technology; one-fourth are data analysts who understand the organization’s data and systems but have limited knowledge of predictive analytics; and 16 percent described themselves as predictive analytics experts who have a deep understanding of this topic but not of technology in general. The research also finds that those most often primarily responsible for designing and deploying predictive analytics are data scientists (in 31% of organizations) or members of the business intelligence and data warehouse team (27%). This focus on business intelligence and data warehousing vr_NG_Predictive_Analytics_16_why_users_dont_produce_predictive_analysesrepresents a shift toward integrating predictive analytics with other technologies and indicates a need to scale predictive analytics across the organization.

In only about half (52%) of organizations are the people who design and deploy predictive analytics the same people who utilize the output of these processes. The most common reasons cited by research participants that users of predictive analytics don’t produce their own analyses are that they don’t have enough skills training (79%) and don’t understand the mathematics involved (66%). The research also finds evidence that skills training pays off: Fully half of those who said they received adequate training in applying predictive analytics to business problems also said they are very satisfied with their predictive analytics; percentages dropped precipitously for those who said the training was somewhat adequate (8%) and inadequate (6%). It is clear that professionals trained in both business and technology are necessary for an organization to successfully understand, deploy and use predictive analytics.

To determine the technical skills and training necessary for predictive analytics, it is important to understand which languages and libraries are used. The research shows that the most common are SQL (used by 67% of organizations) and Microsoft Excel (64%), with which many people are familiar and which are relatively easy to use. The three next-most commonly used are much more sophisticated: the open source language R (by 58%), Java (42%) and Python (36%). Overall, many languages are in use: Three out of five organizations use four or more of them. This array reflects the diversity of approaches to predictive analytics. Organizations must assess what languages make sense for their uses, and vendors must support many languages for predictive analytics to meet the demands of all customers.

The research thus makes clear that organizations must pay attention to a variety of skills and how to combine them with technology to ensure success in using predictive analytics. Not all the skills necessary in an analytics-driven organization can be combined in one person, as I discussed in my analysis of analytic personas. We recommend that as organizations focus on the skills discussed above, they consider creating cross-functional teams from both business and technology groups.

Regards,

Ventana Research